Birdwatch Note
2024-07-29 00:20:27 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This would in fact be considered a branch (after being cut from a tree or a bush) and not a twig. The above notes clearly are trying to mislead the public with this incorrect identification. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruning
Written by 1F191D3FDC49CB5500A542A0A81BF34414FC21D4F6BF6476E9024F93997DF456
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817711922138976296
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817716785665208347
- noteId - 1817716785665208347
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1F191D3FDC49CB5500A542A0A81BF34414FC21D4F6BF6476E9024F93997DF456 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722212427905
- tweetId - 1817711922138976296
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This would in fact be considered a branch (after being cut from a tree or a bush) and not a twig. The above notes clearly are trying to mislead the public with this incorrect identification. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pruning
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-10 13:38:06 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-03 07:48:34 -0500 | Rating Details |