Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-28 21:04:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

Current proposed note does not actually link to any kind of proof. Linking to another post where someone says the same thing you’re saying is not proof. Whether or not I agree. https://x.com

Written by 8F06B1D2CE1B6494E830128E5270ECD39209776ED3290E8F82448F1E832E4F3F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817578206771462243

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1817667413741052142
  • noteId - 1817667413741052142
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8F06B1D2CE1B6494E830128E5270ECD39209776ED3290E8F82448F1E832E4F3F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722200656722
  • tweetId - 1817578206771462243
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • Current proposed note does not actually link to any kind of proof. Linking to another post where someone says the same thing you’re saying is not proof. Whether or not I agree. https://x.com