Birdwatch Note
2024-07-28 17:35:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Die Vorgeschlagene Notiz ist in der Sache zwar korrekt, aber das wurde in diesem Post weder angesprochen, noch behauptet. Also ist die Notiz nicht notwendig.
Written by 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817528129608450422
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817614863490760921
- noteId - 1817614863490760921
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5E36297521F613C07F4D20E7880C88E0342AE788442434F4572DCE0FF729C690 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722188127765
- tweetId - 1817528129608450422
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Die Vorgeschlagene Notiz ist in der Sache zwar korrekt, aber das wurde in diesem Post weder angesprochen, noch behauptet. Also ist die Notiz nicht notwendig.
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-07-31 08:35:35 -0500 | Rating Details |