Birdwatch Note
2024-07-28 16:01:14 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Wrong. No court has ever ruled that. The court ruled about private life intrusion.
Written by 7803CEDE19DBFD32B1E7CC94E0EB4A34DEE5EC92167DE5EFEEB27826CBE2C9B8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817261634680701163
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817591152033542203
- noteId - 1817591152033542203
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7803CEDE19DBFD32B1E7CC94E0EB4A34DEE5EC92167DE5EFEEB27826CBE2C9B8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722182474513
- tweetId - 1817261634680701163
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Wrong. No court has ever ruled that. The court ruled about private life intrusion.