Birdwatch Note
2024-07-28 11:50:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - OP is just expressing his opinion and making a point regarding freedom of speech and individual rights. Other respectable media outlets raised the same concerns expressed by the OP. https://www.economist.com/britain/2022/12/08/britains-actual-problem-with-free-speech?utm_medium=cpc.adword.pd&utm_source=google&ppccampaignID=19495686130&ppcadID=&utm_campaign=a.22brand_pmax&utm_content=conversion.direct-response.anonymous&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADf4Aba3oI_-zHQ1xL6o_4nVOMb1x&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxbTlgNXJhwMV3mJIAB1LEgU8EAAYASAAEgJCU_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-ditches-ban-legal-harmful-online-content-favour-free-speech-2022-11-28/
Written by 05DA5E05CFE84C176420119FE0DDC53924CDE1EF040A18BDB743646D924C9841
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817505415942287824
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817527929045172537
- noteId - 1817527929045172537
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 05DA5E05CFE84C176420119FE0DDC53924CDE1EF040A18BDB743646D924C9841 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722167400980
- tweetId - 1817505415942287824
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - OP is just expressing his opinion and making a point regarding freedom of speech and individual rights. Other respectable media outlets raised the same concerns expressed by the OP. https://www.economist.com/britain/2022/12/08/britains-actual-problem-with-free-speech?utm_medium=cpc.adword.pd&utm_source=google&ppccampaignID=19495686130&ppcadID=&utm_campaign=a.22brand_pmax&utm_content=conversion.direct-response.anonymous&gad_source=1&gbraid=0AAAAADf4Aba3oI_-zHQ1xL6o_4nVOMb1x&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIxbTlgNXJhwMV3mJIAB1LEgU8EAAYASAAEgJCU_D_BwE&gclsrc=aw.ds https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/uk-ditches-ban-legal-harmful-online-content-favour-free-speech-2022-11-28/