Birdwatch Note
2024-07-28 02:25:47 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
The opinion piece is by Dr Alastair Miller, a proponent of GET & CBT. He is opposed to the current NICE guideline which withdrew these therapies as treatments based on a review concluding that evidence for the efficacy of GET & CBT was of "Low" & "Very Low" quality. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10091/documents/evidence-review-7
Written by 0A20BC45A44EB62CB363343297CCC67B9DD477674A608FA75CEA11A7AE82E6F2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1817293809069527169
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817385939184087160
- noteId - 1817385939184087160
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0A20BC45A44EB62CB363343297CCC67B9DD477674A608FA75CEA11A7AE82E6F2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722133547957
- tweetId - 1817293809069527169
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The opinion piece is by Dr Alastair Miller, a proponent of GET & CBT. He is opposed to the current NICE guideline which withdrew these therapies as treatments based on a review concluding that evidence for the efficacy of GET & CBT was of "Low" & "Very Low" quality. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/gid-ng10091/documents/evidence-review-7
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-11 08:47:23 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 09:57:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 13:42:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-01 03:35:07 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 02:29:44 -0500 | Rating Details |