Birdwatch Note
2024-07-28 00:22:45 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Proposed CN 'claims' that MDPI journals are not trustworthy, and proceeds to use 'Wikipedia' and 'Our World in Data' as proof.
Written by 4AE667302904F8E95B7090D33F8BA17140C478635D89E1D3A4B745988EE6F700
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1808219473419424027
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817354976865485129
- noteId - 1817354976865485129
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 4AE667302904F8E95B7090D33F8BA17140C478635D89E1D3A4B745988EE6F700 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722126165965
- tweetId - 1808219473419424027
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Proposed CN 'claims' that MDPI journals are not trustworthy, and proceeds to use 'Wikipedia' and 'Our World in Data' as proof.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-22 11:43:18 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-16 22:21:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-12-14 07:28:42 -0600 | Rating Details |