Birdwatch Note
2024-07-27 21:57:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Information regarding the user's past is, while understandably abhorrent, is irrelevant to the post. If noting a user's past for context on their reliability is a concern, the post containing the false accusations has already been noted. Their unreliability is already apparent.
Written by C53D464704322A1025DB3CF0E5CF482B224845715BDC9D96E5B0DBF0EB6F4133
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816537994545017321
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1817318446994272350
- noteId - 1817318446994272350
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C53D464704322A1025DB3CF0E5CF482B224845715BDC9D96E5B0DBF0EB6F4133 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722117456563
- tweetId - 1816537994545017321
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Information regarding the user's past is, while understandably abhorrent, is irrelevant to the post. If noting a user's past for context on their reliability is a concern, the post containing the false accusations has already been noted. Their unreliability is already apparent.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-30 04:13:44 -0500 | Rating Details |