Birdwatch Note
2024-07-27 00:14:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Please explain why “This is amazing” needs a CN
Written by 8CA48D64F22D5B3BE369024EE46A599504F18D5419FE0857AD03CAEF6E2529FA
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816974609637417112
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816990578107650295
- noteId - 1816990578107650295
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 8CA48D64F22D5B3BE369024EE46A599504F18D5419FE0857AD03CAEF6E2529FA Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722039286531
- tweetId - 1816974609637417112
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - Please explain why “This is amazing” needs a CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-13 14:44:37 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-12 03:11:35 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-09 18:51:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-08 15:18:34 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-02 07:58:47 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-07-31 15:30:52 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-08-26 13:26:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-27 19:57:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-09-17 22:52:48 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-21 00:16:27 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-03 00:51:45 -0500 | Rating Details |