Birdwatch Note
2024-07-26 19:49:32 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN- The court saw a bone in a boneless wing and said the company who made it wasn’t liable for there being a bone in the boneless wing. Thus, they ruled that boneless wings can have bones, as there’s no consequences for not having bones in them anyways.
Written by B1A4376DBAAA4888765F180BE6A4E300A7DD0141DBA4B46C398E5038F9DA09B4
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816573588109164925
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816923828356083745
- noteId - 1816923828356083745
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - B1A4376DBAAA4888765F180BE6A4E300A7DD0141DBA4B46C398E5038F9DA09B4 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722023372150
- tweetId - 1816573588109164925
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN- The court saw a bone in a boneless wing and said the company who made it wasn’t liable for there being a bone in the boneless wing. Thus, they ruled that boneless wings can have bones, as there’s no consequences for not having bones in them anyways.