Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-26 15:40:29 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - The community noter is stating his own opinion of Alex Jones and shares information on a court ruling re Sandy Hook case. Note should be rejected becuase it doesn't provide anything factual on why Alex's own opinion is inocrrect. Thus, it belongs in the comments section.

Written by AA5D81AB9576DD1BE37FFDC375F33C8E1BFFD59022966C961CBEC00037EAE00D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816796947174306086

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816861152493908091
  • noteId - 1816861152493908091
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AA5D81AB9576DD1BE37FFDC375F33C8E1BFFD59022966C961CBEC00037EAE00D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722008429059
  • tweetId - 1816796947174306086
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - The community noter is stating his own opinion of Alex Jones and shares information on a court ruling re Sandy Hook case. Note should be rejected becuase it doesn't provide anything factual on why Alex's own opinion is inocrrect. Thus, it belongs in the comments section.