Birdwatch Note
2024-07-26 15:12:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Petty remarks should go in replies no need for a CN
Written by 24D5D23A8115892DC67D92AD85EB9CB6CAC41D2C36DE85A7D0AB5C978EC8F3E0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816830681378332972
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816854132042408204
- noteId - 1816854132042408204
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 24D5D23A8115892DC67D92AD85EB9CB6CAC41D2C36DE85A7D0AB5C978EC8F3E0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1722006755253
- tweetId - 1816830681378332972
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Petty remarks should go in replies no need for a CN
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-09 03:49:56 -0500 | Rating Details |