Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-26 14:35:00 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

A note about Usha Vance is warranted, but the rest of the note is irrelevant and gets into overtly political territory. If the note is rewritten to only include the relevant information, it would be more likely to become visible

Written by AE28C98BB82AD6D1E8A81BF4992193AAEDE7690C076A06052EFFAAB36043EFA6
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816489879666389470

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816844676454055983
  • noteId - 1816844676454055983
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - AE28C98BB82AD6D1E8A81BF4992193AAEDE7690C076A06052EFFAAB36043EFA6 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1722004500866
  • tweetId - 1816489879666389470
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • A note about Usha Vance is warranted, but the rest of the note is irrelevant and gets into overtly political territory. If the note is rewritten to only include the relevant information, it would be more likely to become visible