Birdwatch Note
2024-07-26 12:37:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Pas besoin de note - l'auteur donne son avis personnel mais ne dit pas que le port du tatouage est illégal
Written by 6940DA9CCCE56A99F2348AC3AA7E8514FB46519894676071CB0E6569D0EF1BD5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816735325281993159
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816815123995963682
- noteId - 1816815123995963682
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6940DA9CCCE56A99F2348AC3AA7E8514FB46519894676071CB0E6569D0EF1BD5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721997455010
- tweetId - 1816735325281993159
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Pas besoin de note - l'auteur donne son avis personnel mais ne dit pas que le port du tatouage est illégal