Birdwatch Note
2024-07-26 11:45:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN- proposed note addresses nothing in the original tweet and cites the Cass Report, a document which critics consider more political than scientific. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
Written by 2DD0315E32382659252052691D3A0DDDE000394A52F0E52C2090200AAE851185
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816389647796228281
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816802142453141793
- noteId - 1816802142453141793
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2DD0315E32382659252052691D3A0DDDE000394A52F0E52C2090200AAE851185 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721994359971
- tweetId - 1816389647796228281
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN- proposed note addresses nothing in the original tweet and cites the Cass Report, a document which critics consider more political than scientific. https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-11-14 11:31:11 -0600 | Rating Details |