Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-26 11:40:13 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

There is nothing factually incorrect or misleading on this post. The suggested notes are argumentative and belong in the comments of the post, not in CN.

Written by 15310F2A737F87561DAC16D0274A50D68CA0D0E90F00451219EF2AB3F7A0A46F
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816321656517976340

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816800688023773381
  • noteId - 1816800688023773381
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 15310F2A737F87561DAC16D0274A50D68CA0D0E90F00451219EF2AB3F7A0A46F Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721994013209
  • tweetId - 1816321656517976340
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • There is nothing factually incorrect or misleading on this post. The suggested notes are argumentative and belong in the comments of the post, not in CN.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-30 16:48:29 -0500 Rating Details