Birdwatch Note
2024-07-25 17:23:56 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - post is clearly joking. CNs are not for explaining jokes. Even if the post was sincere, the proposed note should be a reply instead.
Written by 0AF8A320EB66898A4E1343E75C512224D4FC452E72F33088126E86F81D4732A3
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816212506408632783
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816524802523558207
- noteId - 1816524802523558207
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 0AF8A320EB66898A4E1343E75C512224D4FC452E72F33088126E86F81D4732A3 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721928236977
- tweetId - 1816212506408632783
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 1
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - post is clearly joking. CNs are not for explaining jokes. Even if the post was sincere, the proposed note should be a reply instead.