Birdwatch Note
2024-07-25 14:25:15 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN and community notes was a mistake, there are far more partisan opinions here than actual useful CNs. We're even more biased than the "fact checkers" we were supposed to supercede
Written by BDC069E62A078C207A4916FE6F254DBF43867A1F3739EF64690DE93B29EF7C0B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816321656517976340
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816479834924593397
- noteId - 1816479834924593397
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - BDC069E62A078C207A4916FE6F254DBF43867A1F3739EF64690DE93B29EF7C0B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721917515865
- tweetId - 1816321656517976340
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN and community notes was a mistake, there are far more partisan opinions here than actual useful CNs. We're even more biased than the "fact checkers" we were supposed to supercede
Note Ratings
rated at | rated by | |
2024-08-30 16:48:36 -0500 | Rating Details |