Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-25 08:36:01 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

The post discusses a "wild rumour" without expressing or implying that the claims are factual. It this is not misleading and does not require a CN. Additional details belong in the comments.

Written by 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816360925240131997

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816391947671724155
  • noteId - 1816391947671724155
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 59D78E57BD54EBCA6F13FB54D1CE13EB54C904570B07128C57C5D371F1DAB670 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721896561912
  • tweetId - 1816360925240131997
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • The post discusses a "wild rumour" without expressing or implying that the claims are factual. It this is not misleading and does not require a CN. Additional details belong in the comments.