Birdwatch Note
2024-07-25 05:54:54 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
誤解を招く表現があるため、加筆いたします。 「巡視船と、東海汽船が手配したタグボートによる曳航」とするのがより正確と思われます。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20240724-PQHIOUTFZVLY5HS4YJ43AFJJXY/
Written by 5072891BB87A562541C152D233EDD2DA9E900E4DE8476021510D9C633F72FDD7
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816333006040359157
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816351398944202764
- noteId - 1816351398944202764
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 5072891BB87A562541C152D233EDD2DA9E900E4DE8476021510D9C633F72FDD7 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721886894343
- tweetId - 1816333006040359157
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- 誤解を招く表現があるため、加筆いたします。 「巡視船と、東海汽船が手配したタグボートによる曳航」とするのがより正確と思われます。 https://www.sankei.com/article/20240724-PQHIOUTFZVLY5HS4YJ43AFJJXY/