Birdwatch Note
2024-07-25 01:04:50 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the post is addressing this exact claim. It’s clear the original word used was “colored”. It’s possible (and likely) that they used the confusion of what was said to change what was said because of backlash.
Written by E0975422A84DD75D2AE600890372A2957105D7A93962C03D4CF974ADB45F25CB
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1816180842743619852
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1816278402376012219
- noteId - 1816278402376012219
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - E0975422A84DD75D2AE600890372A2957105D7A93962C03D4CF974ADB45F25CB Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721869490606
- tweetId - 1816180842743619852
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - the post is addressing this exact claim. It’s clear the original word used was “colored”. It’s possible (and likely) that they used the confusion of what was said to change what was said because of backlash.