Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-24 20:57:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - When a CN contributor abuses community notes to post their personal opinion because they are "offended", they are violating the rules of CN by being biased and nonfactual. These people need to have their CN status revoked.

Written by F1D97559DFB3DDD472D051C4925BD74C12EA4AAB046E4D1B0E837F08C0CFF941
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815930558708363717

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816216181239349295
  • noteId - 1816216181239349295
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - F1D97559DFB3DDD472D051C4925BD74C12EA4AAB046E4D1B0E837F08C0CFF941 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721854655930
  • tweetId - 1815930558708363717
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - When a CN contributor abuses community notes to post their personal opinion because they are "offended", they are violating the rules of CN by being biased and nonfactual. These people need to have their CN status revoked.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-13 06:20:05 -0500 Rating Details