Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-24 19:33:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN - AI was used in the making of the fan film, it doesn't matter what aspect it was used for it was still used. Therefore the tweet is not misleading. If you want to argue take it to the replies/QRTs.

Written by 98E2C941D298F2C1EF1B1B00FE27F9366D4A2070E7FF218DB92E6726206E0519
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815740492073615664

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1816194979263569939
  • noteId - 1816194979263569939
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 98E2C941D298F2C1EF1B1B00FE27F9366D4A2070E7FF218DB92E6726206E0519 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721849600984
  • tweetId - 1815740492073615664
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN - AI was used in the making of the fan film, it doesn't matter what aspect it was used for it was still used. Therefore the tweet is not misleading. If you want to argue take it to the replies/QRTs.