Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-24 00:09:43 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The writer arbitrarily assigned an “adequate” time to be considered a long term trial, but in reality, the vax schedule has many years of followup. Using an existing vaccine as a comparator is particularly important for diseases with high morbidity and mortality. https://vaxopedia.org/2017/07/10/where-are-the-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-trials-about-vaccines/ https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/placebos-used-vaccine-trials-do-not-please-everyone

Written by 87862316201459CCE48B6F17413B86E3A1ADA24CD99D30D6D7BE90164C8A678A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815836855931166875

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1815902143217533300
  • noteId - 1815902143217533300
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 87862316201459CCE48B6F17413B86E3A1ADA24CD99D30D6D7BE90164C8A678A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721779783431
  • tweetId - 1815836855931166875
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 1
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The writer arbitrarily assigned an “adequate” time to be considered a long term trial, but in reality, the vax schedule has many years of followup. Using an existing vaccine as a comparator is particularly important for diseases with high morbidity and mortality. https://vaxopedia.org/2017/07/10/where-are-the-double-blind-placebo-controlled-randomized-trials-about-vaccines/ https://www.mcgill.ca/oss/article/covid-19-health/placebos-used-vaccine-trials-do-not-please-everyone