Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 22:11:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Note not needed. Saying her one ancestor, if that, was cruel to her other one, by saying that was common, does not negate that ancestry. Regarding the arguments on whether that is her forebear, arguing such points is allowed.
Written by 83504A9B3BFC6FA8517D1380E370CA3D96090E7A40BF2C6237DE1C3AF9E363B5
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815782867693096993
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815872460899680614
- noteId - 1815872460899680614
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 83504A9B3BFC6FA8517D1380E370CA3D96090E7A40BF2C6237DE1C3AF9E363B5 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721772706615
- tweetId - 1815782867693096993
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Note not needed. Saying her one ancestor, if that, was cruel to her other one, by saying that was common, does not negate that ancestry. Regarding the arguments on whether that is her forebear, arguing such points is allowed.