Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 21:58:14 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Not sure why people is disagreeing with the other post, it's clearly still called Twitter just look at Twitter.com
Written by 6909F3DB1F7F51D8C0A56CF99306387D8BBD421A45C81FA1C2162C42F82ADE0D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815486143741247896
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815869056395927952
- noteId - 1815869056395927952
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6909F3DB1F7F51D8C0A56CF99306387D8BBD421A45C81FA1C2162C42F82ADE0D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721771894917
- tweetId - 1815486143741247896
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Not sure why people is disagreeing with the other post, it's clearly still called Twitter just look at Twitter.com
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-07-31 01:00:28 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-27 15:32:17 -0500 | Rating Details |