Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 21:48:29 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
According to peer-reviewed research, “Impaired fertility is a risk of cross-sex hormones, and the extent of reversibility of this is unclear” Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886596/ Gilmore’s screenshot from an editorial without citations, not a peer reviewed research paper in the Lancet. Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(21)00139-5/fulltext
Written by 78EF08EE5FCDE62FE63CE47F8CFCE9D5EDFA662092580DF75ACB68A5F92F4C66
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815781153820782622
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815866602652311636
- noteId - 1815866602652311636
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 78EF08EE5FCDE62FE63CE47F8CFCE9D5EDFA662092580DF75ACB68A5F92F4C66 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721771309901
- tweetId - 1815781153820782622
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 1
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- According to peer-reviewed research, “Impaired fertility is a risk of cross-sex hormones, and the extent of reversibility of this is unclear” Source: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9886596/ Gilmore’s screenshot from an editorial without citations, not a peer reviewed research paper in the Lancet. Source: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanchi/article/PIIS2352-4642(21)00139-5/fulltext