Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 16:58:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
Contrairement à ce que laisse penser l'illustration, l'appareil, immatriculé 5N-ADB, n'est pas un Boeing 737 de la série MAX, mais un 737-300 âgé de 24 ans. De plus, la compagnie se nomme "Max Air" et non "Max Airlines". https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-737-300-5n-dab-max-air/elkdz3
Written by 26754912B965614AEF178E3C727240B18E11230771DEFB5AE2D2BC492E61AF0B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815777944456798586
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815793554163126398
- noteId - 1815793554163126398
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 26754912B965614AEF178E3C727240B18E11230771DEFB5AE2D2BC492E61AF0B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721753893781
- tweetId - 1815777944456798586
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Contrairement à ce que laisse penser l'illustration, l'appareil, immatriculé 5N-ADB, n'est pas un Boeing 737 de la série MAX, mais un 737-300 âgé de 24 ans. De plus, la compagnie se nomme "Max Air" et non "Max Airlines". https://www.planespotters.net/airframe/boeing-737-300-5n-dab-max-air/elkdz3