Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 09:36:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The Gabba upgrade was to be $2.7b but what Miles is referring to here is the review put forward by Graham Quirk to build a new stadium for $3.4b. This was rejected by Miles. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-18/graham-quirk-olympic-stadium-review-gabba-2032-games/103599506
Written by 577B5DC395799272B8F4C3B3ACAF85523DD8606C71316982C9A40B444039521E
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815555137404030989
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815682444580065425
- noteId - 1815682444580065425
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 577B5DC395799272B8F4C3B3ACAF85523DD8606C71316982C9A40B444039521E Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721727403193
- tweetId - 1815555137404030989
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The Gabba upgrade was to be $2.7b but what Miles is referring to here is the review put forward by Graham Quirk to build a new stadium for $3.4b. This was rejected by Miles. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-03-18/graham-quirk-olympic-stadium-review-gabba-2032-games/103599506
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-06 00:00:06 -0500 | Rating Details |