Birdwatch Note
2024-07-23 06:51:24 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. La nota no es necesaria. El post simplemente opina, dando datos, que la recalificación fue vergonzosa, no que los tribunales la consideraran legal o ilegal.
Written by 78EEB4FABDCE27B1BFEDA2F7ED79F272D7845A4C3FBD9B802B6A1F8B579BBC3C
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815362886983704818
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815640842037772652
- noteId - 1815640842037772652
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 78EEB4FABDCE27B1BFEDA2F7ED79F272D7845A4C3FBD9B802B6A1F8B579BBC3C Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721717484375
- tweetId - 1815362886983704818
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. La nota no es necesaria. El post simplemente opina, dando datos, que la recalificación fue vergonzosa, no que los tribunales la consideraran legal o ilegal.