Birdwatch Note
2024-07-22 22:47:16 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
No it can’t be misinterpreted that way. How you “feel” something ought to be interpreted, as you deliberately misinterpret it, is not grounds for a community note.
Written by 7495FFF20F802DD5A08CE6D96410971FF4F2AEACE796C6E5E8DF59E75A5B46D8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815506527853199600
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815519005362332008
- noteId - 1815519005362332008
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7495FFF20F802DD5A08CE6D96410971FF4F2AEACE796C6E5E8DF59E75A5B46D8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721688436249
- tweetId - 1815506527853199600
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- No it can’t be misinterpreted that way. How you “feel” something ought to be interpreted, as you deliberately misinterpret it, is not grounds for a community note.