Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-22 17:50:20 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. It's worth noting when Vance said this, but do so in a reply. The post isn't misleading.

Written by 7628AF872944C790299E3E1053D70A5F59E5FE3182268A2C65B3378784BF35D2
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815414018502504611

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1815444282381045930
  • noteId - 1815444282381045930
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 7628AF872944C790299E3E1053D70A5F59E5FE3182268A2C65B3378784BF35D2 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721670620903
  • tweetId - 1815414018502504611
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • NNN. It's worth noting when Vance said this, but do so in a reply. The post isn't misleading.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-04 11:31:19 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-03 21:07:58 -0500 Rating Details
2024-09-30 23:31:40 -0500 Rating Details