Birdwatch Note
2024-07-22 13:40:59 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - the "lifetime" in the OP is clearly not literal. We don't need a "well actually"-type CN on every single post. It would be a lame and unnecessary reply; it's abuse when proposed as a CN.
Written by C9DDFD200B7FCEDC67A71F1BC69D2511692F3061DDFC7739411C7E74526BCF7B
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815200676579778761
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815381529910006087
- noteId - 1815381529910006087
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - C9DDFD200B7FCEDC67A71F1BC69D2511692F3061DDFC7739411C7E74526BCF7B Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721655659547
- tweetId - 1815200676579778761
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN - the "lifetime" in the OP is clearly not literal. We don't need a "well actually"-type CN on every single post. It would be a lame and unnecessary reply; it's abuse when proposed as a CN.