Birdwatch Note
2024-07-21 20:34:36 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN- Note about the single image of Jarl Haakon Sigurdson not specifically being an historical portrait is pedantic at best. Leave your biased pedantry to the reply section.
Written by 479C0D3207FC247039BC9A014CE30192E8CA119C106F17F6220C35336CD01D76
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1815053383914631233
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1815123233575964674
- noteId - 1815123233575964674
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 479C0D3207FC247039BC9A014CE30192E8CA119C106F17F6220C35336CD01D76 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721594076903
- tweetId - 1815053383914631233
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN- Note about the single image of Jarl Haakon Sigurdson not specifically being an historical portrait is pedantic at best. Leave your biased pedantry to the reply section.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-23 05:39:07 -0500 | Rating Details |