Birdwatch Note
2024-07-21 10:37:13 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This is a fake claim. And even if it was real, likes are now private on X (Twitter), so there’s no real way to know who even liked it. https://x.com
Written by 63A9D9919160C6E4BF3553B9F3428EA731DADBC2B4C95DF1852A4DB38D8CCB47
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1814891211976511705
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814972894708920510
- noteId - 1814972894708920510
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 63A9D9919160C6E4BF3553B9F3428EA731DADBC2B4C95DF1852A4DB38D8CCB47 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721558233320
- tweetId - 1814891211976511705
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 1
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This is a fake claim. And even if it was real, likes are now private on X (Twitter), so there’s no real way to know who even liked it. https://x.com
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-12-17 07:40:28 -0600 | Rating Details |