Birdwatch Note
2024-07-20 22:48:26 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Contrary to the proposed note’s claim that “There is no evidence to this tweet being correct” there is, in fact, contemporaneous evidence that the tweet is correct: https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/393501/why-sarah-palin-is-a-better-feminist-than-nancy-pelosi/
Written by 6047FDF8B35FE5D4EEC76C4D97900213122546FA5B787C8648ED20D92580FAB2
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1814464590303908242
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814794525497569496
- noteId - 1814794525497569496
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 6047FDF8B35FE5D4EEC76C4D97900213122546FA5B787C8648ED20D92580FAB2 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721515706788
- tweetId - 1814464590303908242
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- Contrary to the proposed note’s claim that “There is no evidence to this tweet being correct” there is, in fact, contemporaneous evidence that the tweet is correct: https://washingtoncitypaper.com/article/393501/why-sarah-palin-is-a-better-feminist-than-nancy-pelosi/