Birdwatch Note
2024-07-20 21:37:58 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
There are no factual claims made by chess.com in the post, and there is no need for a note. If you do not like Jake Paul, then the proper place to express that in the comments or in a quote tweet—not by abusing community notes. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples
Written by 03D34BDDB597DEE7DB9F0C3192367B0648209329C251DE347C39F9371F25D86D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813988751141646384
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814776790323200446
- noteId - 1814776790323200446
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 03D34BDDB597DEE7DB9F0C3192367B0648209329C251DE347C39F9371F25D86D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721511478392
- tweetId - 1813988751141646384
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- There are no factual claims made by chess.com in the post, and there is no need for a note. If you do not like Jake Paul, then the proper place to express that in the comments or in a quote tweet—not by abusing community notes. https://communitynotes.x.com/guide/en/contributing/examples