Birdwatch Note
2024-07-20 18:41:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN - Where non-violent protest, such as described by the judge in this trial [1], is found to meet all 4 elements outlined in Section 78 of the PCSC Act 2022 [2] it may still be considered a public nuisance. How OP phrased it is a matter of personal opinion. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/law/article/2024/jul/19/just-stop-oil-jail-terms-questions-harsh-treatment-protesters#:~:text=The%20statutory%20public%20nuisance%20offence,that%20is%20not%20the%20effect. [2] https://insights.doughtystreet.co.uk/post/102iagn/the-use-of-the-new-statutory-public-nuisance-offence-to-prosecute-political-and-e#:~:text=for%20good%20reason.-,Elements%20of%20the%20statutory%20offence,78(1))%3B
Written by CE16F7713A4D45EE1D23887EBDB7924FE15351FD051719A8B4A88DBA2267A61F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1814389340937789899
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814732369351614883
- noteId - 1814732369351614883
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - CE16F7713A4D45EE1D23887EBDB7924FE15351FD051719A8B4A88DBA2267A61F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721500887607
- tweetId - 1814389340937789899
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN - Where non-violent protest, such as described by the judge in this trial [1], is found to meet all 4 elements outlined in Section 78 of the PCSC Act 2022 [2] it may still be considered a public nuisance. How OP phrased it is a matter of personal opinion. [1] https://www.theguardian.com/law/article/2024/jul/19/just-stop-oil-jail-terms-questions-harsh-treatment-protesters#:~:text=The%20statutory%20public%20nuisance%20offence,that%20is%20not%20the%20effect. [2] https://insights.doughtystreet.co.uk/post/102iagn/the-use-of-the-new-statutory-public-nuisance-offence-to-prosecute-political-and-e#:~:text=for%20good%20reason.-,Elements%20of%20the%20statutory%20offence,78(1))%3B