Birdwatch Note
2024-07-19 16:04:30 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
In it's advisory opinion, the ICJ has not found that Israel is in violation of Article 3 of CERD. The Court only stated that it 'considers' that claim. (p. 65) https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf
Written by F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1814321237000073621
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814330482676359187
- noteId - 1814330482676359187
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - F4C3EC989AB12CE380BF48360631F94798614D2BFD04861248D3D3F62C1BFCF8 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721405070357
- tweetId - 1814321237000073621
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 1
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- In it's advisory opinion, the ICJ has not found that Israel is in violation of Article 3 of CERD. The Court only stated that it 'considers' that claim. (p. 65) https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/186/186-20240719-adv-01-00-en.pdf