Birdwatch Note
2024-07-19 14:00:35 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
Misleading source. Politifact spoke with Meta, who claims the account was fake. No further proof is provided. This can hardly be called 'confirmed'.
Written by 729CD526FF143D6399053E5ABDAF893C6BCF6D3832FA0E4F658F8344E7DE81FE
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813013654578892981
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814299297602543889
- noteId - 1814299297602543889
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 729CD526FF143D6399053E5ABDAF893C6BCF6D3832FA0E4F658F8344E7DE81FE Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721397635256
- tweetId - 1813013654578892981
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- Misleading source. Politifact spoke with Meta, who claims the account was fake. No further proof is provided. This can hardly be called 'confirmed'.