Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-19 00:37:20 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING

The only way they would be biased in taking ad dollars is if they only took them from a single side. There's no evidence that that is the case. https://hashmojis.com/

Written by CA6C9175635E884C9697280A0751DC1250F7B41A4ECCD4CE34CB5711779E8F3D
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1814054919713759339

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1814097152781729945
  • noteId - 1814097152781729945
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - CA6C9175635E884C9697280A0751DC1250F7B41A4ECCD4CE34CB5711779E8F3D Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721349440174
  • tweetId - 1814054919713759339
  • classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 1
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 1
  • summary
    • The only way they would be biased in taking ad dollars is if they only took them from a single side. There's no evidence that that is the case. https://hashmojis.com/

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-08-02 17:58:34 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 17:46:01 -0500 Rating Details
2024-08-02 17:57:20 -0500 Rating Details