Birdwatch Note
2024-07-18 19:49:53 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. text of bill allows third party audits. citation does not support second claim. disagreement with position "could be a conflict of interest" is an opinion. noter's views on opposition to the bill are 1) irrelevant, 2) an opinion. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1047
Written by D2F95B21C0D58A7EBD98E0005C878F278765F16EDADC0B1747D942D4C002296F
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813975620038377482
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1814024816451596784
- noteId - 1814024816451596784
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - D2F95B21C0D58A7EBD98E0005C878F278765F16EDADC0B1747D942D4C002296F Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721332193852
- tweetId - 1813975620038377482
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. text of bill allows third party audits. citation does not support second claim. disagreement with position "could be a conflict of interest" is an opinion. noter's views on opposition to the bill are 1) irrelevant, 2) an opinion. https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=202320240SB1047