Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-18 18:44:28 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN. Walters is expressing an intention, not making a claim about the legality of his proposed action, so discussion of the latter is more appropriate for the replies

Written by 8BEFE1D1934D615FEB54421BB6A3A68467F92F92A0374DDCD9235FE42F77B048
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813382084745982176

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1814008351589880194
  • noteId - 1814008351589880194
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 8BEFE1D1934D615FEB54421BB6A3A68467F92F92A0374DDCD9235FE42F77B048 Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721328268323
  • tweetId - 1813382084745982176
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 1
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN. Walters is expressing an intention, not making a claim about the legality of his proposed action, so discussion of the latter is more appropriate for the replies

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-10-01 16:31:35 -0500 Rating Details