Birdwatch Note
2024-07-18 08:46:13 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The New York Times has confirmed that the shutter speed was 1/8000. The photographer works for the NYT. The note currently being displayed saying it was 1/3000 is factually incorrect.
Written by 91F5DB6467B286CD103F2EEAFDDE3A0195A393F1CF38240F5E383D73994DCF99
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813730603180974387
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813857796485476701
- noteId - 1813857796485476701
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 91F5DB6467B286CD103F2EEAFDDE3A0195A393F1CF38240F5E383D73994DCF99 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721292373188
- tweetId - 1813730603180974387
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 1
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- The New York Times has confirmed that the shutter speed was 1/8000. The photographer works for the NYT. The note currently being displayed saying it was 1/3000 is factually incorrect.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-07 18:53:26 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2025-01-28 00:17:04 -0600 | Rating Details |