Birdwatch Note
2024-07-17 06:00:40 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The post clearly says that it was AI. Any additional information can go to the comment. Notes are needed if the post says factually incorrect information or misleading.
Written by 2D6627D0A5D72EF3D89AAD0573DEF66DEAE3EEEE8A1A61A6FDFD140DEC4C3117
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813288543407731076
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813453749148610993
- noteId - 1813453749148610993
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2D6627D0A5D72EF3D89AAD0573DEF66DEAE3EEEE8A1A61A6FDFD140DEC4C3117 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721196040795
- tweetId - 1813288543407731076
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- NNN. The post clearly says that it was AI. Any additional information can go to the comment. Notes are needed if the post says factually incorrect information or misleading.