Birdwatch Note
2024-07-17 04:25:43 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
This snopes article makes a fallacious argument that Trump was shot in the ear. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bullet-glass-trump-wound/ Without a publicly released medical report that details the injury, it is only conjecture whether a bullet hit his ear or if it were struck by debris.
Written by 1FDE1987B8DDCF67B74D8B923C2DE6E70B4CC80578F8CB2188620C37B0328B6D
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813392705550184865
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813429855016657178
- noteId - 1813429855016657178
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 1FDE1987B8DDCF67B74D8B923C2DE6E70B4CC80578F8CB2188620C37B0328B6D Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721190343991
- tweetId - 1813392705550184865
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 1
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This snopes article makes a fallacious argument that Trump was shot in the ear. https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/bullet-glass-trump-wound/ Without a publicly released medical report that details the injury, it is only conjecture whether a bullet hit his ear or if it were struck by debris.
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-09-29 07:48:55 -0500 | Rating Details |