Birdwatch Note
2024-07-16 18:59:19 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
NNN. The Cass Review has a poor methodology as described. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://epath.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/EPATH-Response-on-Cass-statement_Final_21-05-2024.pdf https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249
Written by 087B20C52E48F4EF63FB15A9D606D0F1E2FF0A8320A668C2E2E68FC1D7A8712A
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1811725501624361424
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813287315726340222
- noteId - 1813287315726340222
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 087B20C52E48F4EF63FB15A9D606D0F1E2FF0A8320A668C2E2E68FC1D7A8712A Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721156359974
- tweetId - 1811725501624361424
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 1
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- NNN. The Cass Review has a poor methodology as described. https://osf.io/preprints/osf/uhndk https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/documents/integrity-project_cass-response.pdf https://www.wpath.org/media/cms/Documents/Public%20Policies/2024/17.05.24%20Response%20Cass%20Review%20FINAL%20with%20ed%20note.pdf?_t=1716075965 https://epath.eu/wp-content/uploads/2024/05/EPATH-Response-on-Cass-statement_Final_21-05-2024.pdf https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/26895269.2024.2328249
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-08-01 07:56:44 -0500 | Rating Details |