Birdwatch Note
2024-07-16 13:11:27 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING
The tweet makes no reference to the preamble and does not suggest that is the reason behind the retaking, please read the wording of the tweet again. In addition, there is no evidence that the omission of ‘heirs and successors’ was accidental.
Written by 2FB06E4FADE2D9E101627BB2B096A1BA018B03649B322A59CBA14C32333AACA0
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1813178056074248331
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813199769700859912
- noteId - 1813199769700859912
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 2FB06E4FADE2D9E101627BB2B096A1BA018B03649B322A59CBA14C32333AACA0 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721135487378
- tweetId - 1813178056074248331
- classification - NOT_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
- trustworthySources - 0
- summary
- The tweet makes no reference to the preamble and does not suggest that is the reason behind the retaking, please read the wording of the tweet again. In addition, there is no evidence that the omission of ‘heirs and successors’ was accidental.