Birdwatch Note
2024-07-16 12:22:17 UTC - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
This claim is unverified. There is no evidence of “boosting” one political party over another. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2025334119
Written by 7FCE2A7EC71761112BDE148217B2B18253FAA9E8C0AEA5E0A6D2F3AB091CAB08
Participant Details
Original Tweet
Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812849984674410781
Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.
All Information
- ID - 1813187395006726422
- noteId - 1813187395006726422
- participantId -
- noteAuthorParticipantId - 7FCE2A7EC71761112BDE148217B2B18253FAA9E8C0AEA5E0A6D2F3AB091CAB08 Participant Details
- createdAtMillis - 1721132537022
- tweetId - 1812849984674410781
- classification - MISINFORMED_OR_POTENTIALLY_MISLEADING
- believable -
- harmful -
- validationDifficulty -
- misleadingOther - 0
- misleadingFactualError - 0
- misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
- misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
- misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
- misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 1
- misleadingSatire - 0
- notMisleadingOther - 0
- notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
- notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
- notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
- notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 0
- trustworthySources - 1
- summary
- This claim is unverified. There is no evidence of “boosting” one political party over another. https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2025334119
Note Ratings
| rated at | rated by | |
| 2024-10-23 12:03:50 -0500 | Rating Details | |
| 2024-10-23 16:14:16 -0500 | Rating Details |