Birdwatch Archive

Birdwatch Note

2024-07-15 20:28:46 UTC - NOT_MISLEADING

NNN, this is personal opinion that is unrelated to the shooting, since EM could have shared this even if the shooting had not occurred.

Written by 40C8E16EE5819ED9BE0B4A9EBBBB5F84091400572F63B1BB75F863E3EE1C984A
Participant Details

Original Tweet

Tweet embedding is no longer reliably available, due to the platform's instability (in terms of both technology and policy). If the Tweet still exists, you can view it here: https://twitter.com/foo_bar/status/1812602944975782245

Please note, though, that you may need to have your own Twitter account to access that page. I am currently exploring options for archiving Tweet data in a post-API context.

All Information

  • ID - 1812947435297382558
  • noteId - 1812947435297382558
  • participantId -
  • noteAuthorParticipantId - 40C8E16EE5819ED9BE0B4A9EBBBB5F84091400572F63B1BB75F863E3EE1C984A Participant Details
  • createdAtMillis - 1721075326170
  • tweetId - 1812602944975782245
  • classification - NOT_MISLEADING
  • believable -
  • harmful -
  • validationDifficulty -
  • misleadingOther - 0
  • misleadingFactualError - 0
  • misleadingManipulatedMedia - 0
  • misleadingOutdatedInformation - 0
  • misleadingMissingImportantContext - 0
  • misleadingUnverifiedClaimAsFact - 0
  • misleadingSatire - 0
  • notMisleadingOther - 0
  • notMisleadingFactuallyCorrect - 0
  • notMisleadingOutdatedButNotWhenWritten - 0
  • notMisleadingClearlySatire - 0
  • notMisleadingPersonalOpinion - 1
  • trustworthySources - 0
  • summary
    • NNN, this is personal opinion that is unrelated to the shooting, since EM could have shared this even if the shooting had not occurred.

Note Ratings

rated at rated by
2024-07-31 02:02:49 -0500 Rating Details
2024-10-05 21:18:07 -0500 Rating Details
2025-01-16 13:42:01 -0600 Rating Details
2025-01-06 15:27:45 -0600 Rating Details